Kuka, a leading global supplier of automation solutions and industrial robots, has been active in the Chinese market for over 25 years. The story started when the Augsburg-based company, which celebrated its 125th anniversary in 2023, received a major order from Audi AG to supply robots to its plant in Changchun. It meant Kuka could lay claim to being “one of the first global companies to export robots to China.” That was all the way back in 1998. In the subsequent years, the Augsburg-based company opened several branches and production facilities of its own in China, all to little public attention. Then, in 2016, a major outcry, when Kuka was taken over by the Chinese company Midea, a business primarily known for its air conditioners, microwaves and rice cookers. The move was seen in Germany as a major fall from grace. The media complained of a “sell-out of the German economy” and a transfer of know-how “from Augsburg to China.”
For Kuka, the deal has not been bad for business. In fact, the company recorded an 8.1% increase in employee numbers shortly after the takeover, and turnover has now risen from 3.5 billion euros (2017) to 4.1 billion euros (2023). So was selling to Midea the right decision, despite all the criticism? Prof. Johannes Fottner, who holds the Chair of Materials Handling, Material Flow, Logistics at the Technical University of Munich and travels extensively in China, takes a pragmatic view: “No German investors submitted a suitable bid anyway.” Of course it is important to distinguish between a complete takeover and a collaboration, he says, and the latter is usually more acceptable to the public. But even a takeover is not a bad thing per se. “There are good and bad investors in China, just like in the USA.”